4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Cancer patient preferences for communication of prognosis in the metastatic setting

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
Volume 22, Issue 9, Pages 1721-1730

Publisher

AMER SOC CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2004.04.095

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose To identify preferences for and predictors of prognostic information among patients with incurable metastatic cancer. Patients and Methods One hundred twenty-six metastatic cancer patients seeing 30 oncologists at 12 outpatient clinics in New South Wales, Australia, participated in the study. Patients were diagnosed with incurable metastatic disease within 6 weeks to 6 months of recruitment. Patients completed a survey eliciting their preferences for prognostic information, including type, quantity, mode, and timing of presentation; anxiety and depression levels; and information and involvement preferences. Results More than 95% of patients wanted information about side effects, symptoms, and treatment options. The majority wanted to know longest survival time with treatment (85%), 5-year survival rates (80%), and average survival (81%). Words and numbers were preferred over pie charts or graphs. Fifty-nine percent (59%) wanted to discuss expected survival when first diagnosed with metastatic disease. Thirty-eight percent and 44% wanted to negotiate when expected survival and dying, respectively, were discussed. Patients with higher depression scores were more likely to want to know shortest time to live without treatment (P = .047) and average survival (P = .049). Lower depression levels were significantly associated with never wanting to discuss expected survival (P = .03), Patients with an expected survival of years were more likely to want to discuss life expectancy when first diagnosed with metastases (P = .02). Conclusion Most metastatic cancer patients want detailed prognostic information but prefer to negotiate the extent, format, and timing of the information they receive from their oncologists.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available