4.7 Article

Database of normal human cerebral blood flow, cerebral blood volume, cerebral oxygen extraction fraction and cerebral metabolic rate of oxygen measured by positron emission tomography with 15O-labelled carbon dioxide or water, carbon monoxide and oxygen:: a multicentre study in Japan

Journal

Publisher

SPRINGER-VERLAG
DOI: 10.1007/s00259-003-1430-8

Keywords

PET; cerebral blood flow; cerebral blood volume; oxygen extraction fraction; cerebral metabolic rate of oxygen

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Measurement of cerebral blood flow (CBF), cerebral blood volume (CBV), cerebral oxygen extraction fraction (OEF) and cerebral metabolic rate of oxygen (CMRO2) by positron emission tomography (PET) with oxygen-15 labelled carbon dioxide ((CO2)-O-15) or O-15-labelled water ((H2O)-O-15), O-15-labelled carbon monoxide ((CO)-O-15) and O-15-labelled oxygen (O-15(2)) is useful for diagnosis and treatment planning in cases of cerebrovascular disease. The measured values theoretically depend on various factors, which may differ between PET centres. This study explored the applicability of a database of O-15-PET by examining between-centre and within-centre variation in values. Eleven PET centres participated in this multicentre study; seven used the steady-state inhalation method, one used build-up inhalation and three used bolus administration of (CO2)-O-15 (or (H2O)-O-15) and O-15(2). All used (CO)-O-15 for measurement of CBV. Subjects comprised 70 healthy volunteers (43 men and 27 women; mean age 51.8+/-15.1 years). Overall mean+/-SD values for cerebral cortical regions were: CBF=44.4+/-6.5 ml 100 ml(-1) min(-1); CBV=3.8+/-0.7 ml 100 ml(-1); OEF=0.44+/-0.06; CMRO2=3.3+/-0.5 ml 100 ml(-1) min(-1). Significant between-centre variation was observed in CBV, OEF and CMRO2 by one-way analysis of variance. However, the overall inter-individual variation in CBF, CBV, OEF and CMRO2 was acceptably small. Building a database of normal cerebral haemodynamics obtained by the(15)O-PET methods may be practicable.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available