4.7 Article

Induction of complete tumor necrosis may reduce intrahepatic metastasis and prolong survival in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma undergoing locoregional therapy: a prospective study

Journal

ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY
Volume 15, Issue 5, Pages 775-780

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdh184

Keywords

arterial embolization; hepatocellular carcinoma; liver cirrhosis; metastasis; percutaneous acetic acid injection

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) and percutaneous acetic acid injection (PAI) are effective locoregional therapies for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). This study aimed to investigate whether HCC patients who had initial complete response to these treatments had a subsequent lower risk of intrahepatic metastasis. Patients and methods: A total of 152 patients who underwent locoregional therapy (94 received PAI and 58 received both TACE and PAI) for HCC (tumor size less than or equal to5 cm) were prospectively evaluated. Results: In all, 60 (39%) patients had a complete tumor necrosis after treatment. The cumulative incidence of the development of intrahepatic metastasis was lower for patients with complete remission (P = 0.005) and for patients with smaller (less than or equal to3 cm) tumor size (P = 0.083). Cox multivariate survival analysis showed that absence of complete remission [relative risk (RR) 2.7; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.4-5.3; P = 0.003] was the only independent factor that predicted the occurrence of intrahepatic metastasis. Patients with complete remission had a significantly better long-term survival than those without (P = 0.002), and the occurrence of intrahepatic metastasis over time independently predicted a decreased survival (RR 3.2; 95% CI 2.0-6.1; P = 0.019). Conclusions: Induction of complete tumor necrosis in HCC patients undergoing locoregional therapy may decrease the risk of intrahepatic metastasis and improve survival.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available