4.7 Article

Effect of glyphosate on the sperm quality of zebrafish Danio rerio

Journal

AQUATIC TOXICOLOGY
Volume 155, Issue -, Pages 322-326

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.aquatox.2014.07.006

Keywords

Herbicide; Danio rerio; Reproduction; Sperm motility; DNA damage

Funding

  1. CAPES (Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior) [42004012008P9]
  2. National Institute of Science and Technology-Aquatic Toxicology (INCT-TA) from CNPq (Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico) [573949/2008-5]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Glyphosate is a systemic, non-selective herbicide widely used in agriculture worldwide. It acts as an inhibitor of the enzyme 5-enolpyruvylshikimate-3-phosphate synthase by interrupting the synthesis of essential aromatic amino acids. This pathway is not present in animals, although some studies have shown that the herbicide glyphosate can affect fish reproduction. In this study, the effect of glyphosate on sperm quality of the fish Danio rerio was investigated after 24 and 96 h of exposure at concentrations of 5 mg/L and 10 mg/L. The spermatic cell concentration, sperm motility and motility period were measured employing conventional microscopy. The mitochondrial functionality, membrane integrity and DNA integrity were measured by fluorescence microscopy using specific probes. No significant differences in sperm concentration were observed; however, sperm motility and the motility period were reduced after exposure to both glyphosate concentrations during both exposure periods. The mitochondrial functionality and membrane and DNA integrity were also reduced at the highest concentration during both exposure periods. The results showed that glyphosate can induce harmful effects on reproductive parameters in D. rerio and that this change would reduce the fertility rate of these animals. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available