4.1 Article

Imatinib mesylate for the treatment of gastrointestinal stromal tumours: best monitored with FDG PET

Journal

NUCLEAR MEDICINE COMMUNICATIONS
Volume 25, Issue 5, Pages 433-438

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/00006231-200405000-00002

Keywords

FDG; PET; gastro-intestinal stroma tumours; response evaluation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background The new anti-cancer drug imatinib mesylate inhibits the tyrosine kinase growth factor receptor, c-KIT, and has shown spectacular activity in patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GISTs). Objective To assess whether fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG PET) is suitable for response evaluation of this new type of tumour treatment. Methods Sixteen consecutive patients with irresectable or metastasized GIST or another c-KIT (CD117) positive mesenchymal tumour underwent FDG PET before and 1 week after the start of treatment with imatinib mesylate (Glivec(R)). Visual findings and standard uptake values (SUVs) were compared with the overall response to treatment, based on clinical and radiological response. Results PET visualized all known and some unknown tumour locations. The separation by PET after 1 week of treatment in 'PET responders' (11/16 patients, mean SUV reduction 65%) versus 'PET non-responders' (5/16 patients, mean SUV increase 16%) appeared to match almost perfectly with overall treatment response and proved correct in 14/15 patients (prediction sensitivity 93%). FDG uptake changes after 1 week of treatment were of greater magnitude than tumour volume changes on computed tomography at 8 weeks. Progression-free survival was significantly better in patients with a PET response (P=0.002). PET response predicted treatment outcome better than the radiological response. Finally, PET was helpful during follow-up, in discriminating side effects from tumour progression. Conclusion FDG PET is a valuable tool in patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumours treated with imatinib mesylate. It improves staging, accurately separates responders from non-responders in an early phase, and is helpful during follow-up.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available