4.4 Article

Antibody response to Pseudomonas aeruginosa in cystic fibrosis patients:: A marker of therapeutic success?: A 30-year cohort study of survival in Danish CF patients after onset of chronic P aeruginosa lung infection

Journal

PEDIATRIC PULMONOLOGY
Volume 37, Issue 5, Pages 427-432

Publisher

WILEY-LISS
DOI: 10.1002/ppul.10457

Keywords

cystic fibrosis; Pseudomonas aeruginosa; antibody response; cohort study

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We studied the effects of increasingly intensive treatment regimens on antipseudomonal antibody response and survival in five successive cohorts of a total of 157 Danish cystic fibrosis patients after they had acquired chronic P. aeruginosa lung infection. The time periods were 1971-1975 (N=21), 1976-1980 (N=64), 1981-1986 (N=27), 1987-1993 (N=26), and 1994-2000 (N=19). During this 30-year period, we introduced elective 2-week courses of chemotherapy every third month in all chronically infected patients, early aggressive treatment with inhalation of colistin and oral ciprofloxacin for 3 months whenever P. aeruginosa was cultured in sputum from noncolonized patients, and inhalation of recombinant human dornase alfa. There was a significant correlation between the calendar year when chronic P. aeruginosa infection was acquired and the subsequent increase in the level of precipitins (P < 0.00001). The median number of precipitins increased by 5 per year in the oldest calendar year cohort, and 1 per year in the youngest. The median age of onset of chronic P. aeruginosa increased from 9.3 years from 1981-1986 to 13.8 years from 1987-2000. Survival after acquisition of chronic P. aeruginosa lung infection improved with time (P=0.008). Our study shows that CF patients who are treated intensively have lower antibody responses and longer survival after acquisition of chronic P. aeruginosa lung infection. (C) 2004 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available