4.8 Article

Chronic response of adult rat brain tissue to implants anchored to the skull

Journal

BIOMATERIALS
Volume 25, Issue 12, Pages 2229-2237

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2003.09.010

Keywords

biocompatibility; fluorescence; immunochemistry; membrane

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Using quantitative immunohistological methods, we examined the brain tissue response to hollow fiber membranes (HFMs) that were either implanted intraparenchymally, as in a cell encapsulation application, or were attached to the skull as in a biosensor application (transcranially). We found that the reaction surrounding transcranially implanted HFMs was significantly greater than that observed with intraparenchymally implanted materials including increases in immunoreactivity against GFAP, vimentin, ED-1 labeled macrophages and microglia, and several extracellular matrix proteins including collagen, fibronectin, and laminin. In general, these markers were elevated along the entire length of transcranially implanted HFMs extending into the adjacent parenchyma up to 0.5 min from the implant interface. Intraparenchymal implants did not appear to have significant involvement of a fibroblastic component as suggested by a decreased expression of vimentin, fibronectin and collagen-type I at the implant tissue interface. The increase in tissue reactivity observed with transcranially implanted HFMs may be influenced by several mechanisms including chronic contact with the meninges and possibly motion of the device within brain tissue. Broadly speaking, our results suggest that any biomaterial, biosensor or device that is anchored to the skull and in chronic contact with meningeal tissue will have a higher level of tissue reactivity than the same material completely implanted within brain tissue. (C) 2003 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available