4.5 Article

Nerve conduction block utilising high-frequency alternating current

Journal

MEDICAL & BIOLOGICAL ENGINEERING & COMPUTING
Volume 42, Issue 3, Pages 394-406

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/BF02344716

Keywords

conduction block; alternating current; depolarisation; high frequency

Funding

  1. NIBIB NIH HHS [8R01-EB-002091] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

High-frequency alternating current (AC) waveforms have been shown to produce a quickly reversible nerve block in animal models, but the parameters and mechanism of this block are not well understood. A frog sciatic nervel gastrocnemius muscle preparation was used to examine the parameters for nerve conduction block in vivo, and a computer simulation of the nerve membrane was used to identify the mechanism for block. The results indicated that a 100% block of motor activity can be accomplished with a variety of waveform parameters, including sinusoidal and rectangular waveforms at frequencies from 2kHz to 20kHz. A complete and reversible block was achieved in 34 out of 34 nerve preparations tested. The most efficient waveform for conduction block was a 3-5kHz constant-current biphasic sinusoid, where block could be achieved with stimulus levels as low as 0.01 muCphase(-1). It was demonstrated that the block was not produced indirectly through fatigue. Computer simulation of high-frequency AC demonstrated a steady-state depolarisation of the nerve membrane, and it is hypothesised that the conduction block was due to this tonic depolarisation. The precise relationship between the steady-state depolarisation and the conduction block requires further analysis. The results of this study demonstrated that high-frequency AC can be used to produce a fast-acting, and quickly reversible nerve conduction block that may have multiple applications in the treatment of unwanted neural activity.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available