4.8 Article

Influence of synthesis and sintering parameters on the characteristics of carbonate apatite

Journal

BIOMATERIALS
Volume 25, Issue 10, Pages 1763-1770

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2003.08.026

Keywords

carbonate-substituted hydroxyapatite (CHA); CHA synthesis; CHA characterisation; carbonate site evaluation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A new method to synthesise carbonate-substituted hydroxyapatite (CHA) powder has been set up introducing a CO2 flux, as a source of carbonate, in the HA synthesis process based on the neutralisation reaction. The reactants are abundant and inexpensive. The yield is good compared to other CHA powder synthesis. The reaction may be performed at low temperature and without pH control and does not produce any by-products. The influence of the synthesis parameters (temperature, H3PO4 solution dropping rate, i.e. reaction time, CO2 flux, ageing time) has been tested to optimise the process conditions in order to obtain the highest carbonation degree and favour the B-type CHA precipitation with respect to A-type one. The prepared powder (5.8 wt% of total carbonate with an A/B ratio of 0.78) was thermally treated at various temperatures in the range 500-1400degreesC in different atmospheres (air, wet and dry carbon dioxide). The thermal treatments were performed with a double aim, to eliminate selectively the carbonate groups in A-position maintaining the B-type substitution, and to evaluate the thermal stability of the CHA and the total loss of carbonate as a function of temperature. The thermal treatment at 900degreesC in wet CO2, gave the best result in terms of a high carbonate residue and a low A/B ratio. We also investigate the use of different techniques (inductively coupled plasma, TGA, Fourier transformed infrared spectroscopy, X-ray diffraction) for characterising CHA and calculating sensitivity and accuracy in the quantification of carbonate ions for each molecular site. (C) 2003 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available