4.7 Article

Genetic variation responsible for mouse strain differences in integrin α2 expression is associated with altered platelet responses to collagen

Journal

BLOOD
Volume 103, Issue 9, Pages 3396-3402

Publisher

AMER SOC HEMATOLOGY
DOI: 10.1182/blood-2003-10-3721

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [R01 HL065229, HL66728, HL65229, R01 HL088458] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

As mouse models have become commonplace for studying hemostasis and thrombosis, we considered whether the mouse system had utility for assessing genetic alterations in platelet receptors. Platelets from 5 mouse strains (C57BL/6 [C57], FVB/N [FVB], BALB/c, C3H/He, and 129Sv) showed only minor differences in the expression of integrin alpha(IIb), integrin beta(3), glycoprotein (GP) Ibalpha, or GPVI across strains. However, FVB platelets expressed approximately 50% the level of integrin alpha(2) as platelets from other strains (P < .0001). We bred FVB mice with C57 and assessed alpha(2) expression in FVB/C57xFVB/C57 (F2) offspring. Linkage analysis demonstrated the gene responsible for alpha(2) levels is tightly linked to the D13mit260 marker (log odds [lod] score 6.7) near the alpha(2) gene. FVB platelets showed reduced aggregation and a longer lag phase to collagen. FVB and C57 platelets aggregated similarly to collagen-related peptide, but FVB platelets showed a reduction in rhodocytin-induced Syk and PLCgamma2 tyrosine phosphorylation. Thus, FVB platelets express half the level of alpha(2) as other mouse strains, a trait linked to the alpha(2) gene and seemingly responsible for reduced platelet aggregation to collagen. These strain differences serve as a useful model for the 2-fold difference in human platelet alpha(2)beta(1) expression and demonstrate that alpha(2)beta(1) participates in signaling during platelet activation. (C) 2004 by The American Society of Hematology.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available