4.7 Article

Islet cell autoimmunity in a triethnic adult population of the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey

Journal

DIABETES
Volume 53, Issue 5, Pages 1293-1302

Publisher

AMER DIABETES ASSOC
DOI: 10.2337/diabetes.53.5.1293

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [HL 07011, N01 HC 85082] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIDDK NIH HHS [R01 DK 56200, R01 DK 53456] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Markers of Immoral islet cell autoimmunity, such as autoantibodies (AAs) against the 65-kDa isoform of GAD (GAD65), serve as determinants of risk for autoimmune diabetes. Despite the high prevalence of diabetes in U.S. racial and ethnic minority adult populations, little is known concerning the prevalence of GAD65 AA in these groups. We estimated the prevalence of GAD65 AA in 1,064 diabetic and 1,036 nondiabetic participants who were 40-90 years of age from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES 111), which provides a representative ethnic sample of the U.S. diabetic population. The prevalence of GAD65 AA was higher in diabetic participants compared with nondiabetic participants in non-Hispanic whites (n = 920; 6.3% vs. 2.0%; P = 0.001) and non-Hispanic blacks (n = 534; 3.7% vs. 1.3%; P = 0.08) but not in Mexican Americans (n = 646; 1.2% vs. 2.6%; P = 0.18). Among diabetic non-Hispanic whites and non-Hispanic blacks, being GAD65 AA positive was associated with lower BMI and C-peptide (P < 0.05). These results may reflect the outcome of an autoimmune process leading to beta-cell destruction/dysfunction in non-Hispanic white and non-Hispanic black adult diabetic patients as it occurs in a similar manner in type 1 diabetes. Among diabetic Mexican Americans, the lower prevalence of GAD65 AA suggests a lower frequency of antoimmune-related diabetes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available