4.5 Article

Are choice experiments incentive compatible? A test with quality differentiated beef steaks

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS
Volume 86, Issue 2, Pages 467-482

Publisher

BLACKWELL PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.1111/j.0092-5853.2004.00592.x

Keywords

CVM; conjoint analysis; heteroskedastic extreme value model; hypothetical bias; multinomial probit; random parameters logit

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study compares hypothetical and nonhypothetical responses to choice experiment questions. We test for hypothetical bias in a choice experiment involving beef ribeye steaks with differing quality attributes. In general, hypothetical responses predicted higher probabilities of purchasing beef steaks than nonhypothetical responses. Thus, hypothetical choices overestimate total willingness-to-pay for beef steaks. However, marginal willingness-to-pay for a change in steak quality is, in general, not statistically different across hypothetical and actual payment settings.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available