4.3 Article

Resprouting after disturbance in the short-lived herb Rorippa palustris (Brassicaceae):: an experiment with juveniles

Journal

ACTA OECOLOGICA-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ECOLOGY
Volume 25, Issue 3, Pages 143-150

Publisher

GAUTHIER-VILLARS/EDITIONS ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.actao.2003.12.004

Keywords

adventitious bud on root; axillary bud; defoliation; injury; Oenothera biennis; root crown

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The impact of plant age, severity of injury and nutrient levels on the ability to resprout from roots was experimentally assessed in juveniles short-lived herb Rorippa palustris (L.) Besser. In a chamber experiment, six cohorts of young plants (1-6 week old) were injured to obtain data on the threshold age for the ability to resprout from roots. We found that plant age was an important factor influencing resprouting ability: injured individuals older than 5 weeks were able to resprout, but not plants younger than 3 weeks. The impact of injury severity (defoliation and removal of axillary buds) and nutrient levels on resprouting ability was assessed on juveniles in a greenhouse experiment. Injury induced growth of new shoots from root buds, while the number of adventitious buds on roots was not influenced by injury. Both injury treatments had a similar effect in this respect, and the amount of regenerated biomass and the extent of regeneration were not different among injury treatments. The number of new shoots produced after injury was higher at the high nutrient level, but the number of formed adventitious buds on roots was not influenced by nutrient level. Nutrient level also influenced the amount of regenerated biomass, but the extent of regeneration (regenerated/removed biomass) was not influenced. The short-lived monocarpic species R. palustris is able to resprout from roots relatively easily. This ability seems to be advantageous in disturbed habitats and this idea is discussed throughout the paper. (C) 2004 Elsevier SAS. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available