4.7 Article

Endosulfan I and endosulfan sulfate disrupts zebrafish embryonic development

Journal

AQUATIC TOXICOLOGY
Volume 95, Issue 4, Pages 355-361

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.aquatox.2009.10.008

Keywords

Zebrafish; Endosulfan; Endosulfan sulfate; Development

Funding

  1. National Institute of Health (NIH)/National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS) [ES00210]
  2. John Hopkins Center for the Alternatives

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Fish in agricultural and remote areas may be exposed to endosulfan and its degradation products as a result of direct runoff, atmospheric transport and deposition. The following study used the zebrafish developmental model to investigate the responses to endosulfan I and endosulfan sulfate, the major degradation product of endosulfan I and II. Embryos were dechorionated and waterborne exposed to the endosulfan I or endosulfan sulfate from 6 to 120 h post-fertilization (hpf). Endosulfan I exposure concentrations ranged from 0.01 to 10 mu g/L and endosulfan sulfate from 1 to 100 mu g/L. Water solutions were renewed every 24 h and fish were scored for overt developmental and behavioral abnormalities. Chemical analysis was performed on water, whole embryo, and larvae samples to determine waterborne exposure concentrations and tissue concentrations throughout the 5-day period. The most sensitive toxicity end-point for both endosulfan I and endosulfan sulfate was an abnormal response of the embryo/larvae to touch, suggesting that endosulfan I and sulfate are developmentally neurotoxic. The waterborne exposure EC(50)s for inhibition of touch response for endosulfan I and endosulfan sulfate were 2.2 mu g/L and 23 mu g/L, respectively. The endosulfans were highly concentrated by the organisms, and the inhibition of touch response tissue EC50, determined from the measured tissue concentrations, was 367 ng/g for endosulfan I and 4552 ng/g for endosulfan sulfate. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available