4.7 Article

Isolation and technological properties of coagulase negative staphylococci from fermented sausages of Southern Italy

Journal

MEAT SCIENCE
Volume 67, Issue 1, Pages 149-158

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2003.10.003

Keywords

coagulase negative staphylococci; technological properties; dry fermented sausages; sausages of Southern Italy

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The aims of this study were to characterize the population of Micrococcaceae in different types of fermented sausages of Southern Italy and to determine the technological properties of Staphylococcus strains in order to evaluate the suitability of selected strains as starter cultures in the processing of dry fermented pork sausages. Ninety-six strains were studied to evaluate nitrate reductase, proteolytic, lipolytic and antioxidant activities as well as growth ability at different temperatures, pH's and NaCl concentrations. All the strains were classified as Staphylococcus except for one isolate assigned to Kocuria spp. The species most often isolated were S. saprophyticus, S. xylosus and S. equorum, although they were not equally distributed within the different sausages. Other species isolated were, in descending order of abundance, S. succinus, S. warneri, S. lentus, S. vitulus, S. pasteuri, S. epidermidis, and S. haemolyticus. In general, the S. xylosus strains exhibited the best technological properties that would make them eligible as good starter cultures for fermented meat products. However, strains belonging to other species also showed good technological properties. Finally, all strains grew at 10, 15 and 20 degreesC, in the presence of 10% and 15% of NaCl and at pH 5.0 and 5.5. The results showed that it is possible to formulate a broad variety of staphylococcal starter cultures, adaptable to different technological conditions and sausage manufacture practices. (C) 2003 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available