4.1 Article

Performance of phaseolus bean rhizobia in soils from the major production sites in the Nile Delta

Journal

COMPTES RENDUS BIOLOGIES
Volume 327, Issue 5, Pages 445-453

Publisher

centre Mersenne pour ldition scientifique ouverte
DOI: 10.1016/j.crvi.2004.03.005

Keywords

phaseolus bean; inoculation; rhizobia; competition; fluorescent antibody; REP-PCR fingerprinting

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The symbiotic and competitive performances of two highly effective rhizobia nodulating French bean P vulgaris were studied in silty loam and clayey soils. The experiments were carried out to address the performance of two rhizobia strains [CE3 and Ph, 163] and the mixture thereof with the two major cultivated bean cultivars in two soil types from major growing French bean areas in Egypt. Clay and silty loam soils from Menoufia and Ismailia respectively were planted with Bronco and Giza 6 phaseolus bean cultivars. The data obtained from this study indicated that rhizobial inoculation of Giza 6 cultivar in clayey soil showed a positive response to inoculation in terms of nodule numbers and dry weight. This response was also positive in dry matter and biomass accumulation by the plants. The inoculant of strain CE3 enhanced plant growth and N-uptake relative to Ph. 163. However, the mixed inoculant strains were not always as good as single strain inoculants. The competition for nodulation was assessed using two techniques namely fluorescent antibody testing (FA) and REP-PCR fingerprinting. The nodule occupancy by inoculant strain Ph. 163 in both soils occupied 30-40% and 38-50 of nodules of cultivar Bronco. The mixed inocula resulted in higher proportions of nodules containing CE3 in silty loam soil and Ph. 163 in clayey soil. The native rhizobia occupied at least 50% of the nodules on the Bronco cultivar. For cultivar Giza 6, the native rhizobia were more competitive with the inoculant strains. Therefore, we suggest using the studied strains as commercial inocula for phaseolus bean. (C) 2004 Academie des sciences. Published by Elsevier SAS. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available