Journal
BONE
Volume 34, Issue 5, Pages 790-798Publisher
ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2004.02.001
Keywords
bone; fracture; toughening; crack bridging; microcracking
Categories
Funding
- NIDCR NIH HHS [5R01 DE015633] Funding Source: Medline
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Two major mechanisms that could potentially be responsible for toughening in mineralized tissues, such as bone and dentin, have been identified-microcracking and crack bridging. While evidence has been reported for both mechanisms, there has been no consensus thus far on which mechanism plays the dominant role in toughening these materials. In the present study, we seek to present definitive experimental evidence supporting crack bridging, rather than microcracking, as the most significant mechanism of toughening in cortical bone and dentin. In vitro fracture toughness experiments were conducted to measure the variation of the fracture resistance with crack extension [resistance-curve (R-curve) behavior] for both materials with special attention paid to changes in the sample compliance. Because these two toughening mechanisms induce opposite effects on the sample compliance, such experiments allow for the definitive determination of the dominant toughening mechanism, which in the present study was found to be crack bridging for microstructurally large crack sizes. The results of this work are of relevance from the perspective of developing a micromechanistic framework for understanding fracture behavior of mineralized tissue and in predicting failure in vivo. (C) 2004 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available