4.6 Article

Intracerebral hemorrhage in mice: Model characterization and application for genetically modified mice

Journal

JOURNAL OF CEREBRAL BLOOD FLOW AND METABOLISM
Volume 24, Issue 5, Pages 487-494

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1097/00004647-200405000-00002

Keywords

intracerebral hernorrhage; brain edema; behavior; gender; complement; mouse

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Gene knockout or transgenic aninials may assist in elucidating the mechanisms of brain injury after intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH). However, almost all commercially available transgenic or knockout aninials are mice. The Purpose of this study was to develop an ICH model in mice and to investigate the influence of gender and complement C5 genetic differences on outcome after ICH. Male and female C57BL/6 mice and C5-deficient and -sufficient control mice were anesthetized and then received an injection of 30 muL autologous whole blood into the right basal ganglia. Brain water content Was Studied at I and 3 days after ICH. Behavioral tests (fore-limb use asymmetry and corner turn test) were performed at 1, 3 7, 14, 21, or 28 days after ICH. In male mice, brain water content was significantly increased in the ipsilateral basal ganglia I and 3 days after ICH, compared with saline injection controls (P < 0.01). There were marked neurological deficits 1 and 3 days after ICH, with progressive recovery over 28 days. In contrast, although brain ederna and behavioral deficits were similar at 1 day after ICH in female and male mice, female mice showed reduced edema at 3 days and a faster recovery of behavioral deficits after ICH. 17beta-estradiol treatment in male mice markedly reduced ICH-induced edema (P < 0.01). Brain water content was significantly increased in C5-deficient mice compared with C5-sufficient at 3 days after ICH (P < 0.05). These findings suggest that the mouse ICH model is a reproducible and feasible model. These results also suggest that gender and complement C5 are factors affecting brain injury after ICH.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available