4.4 Article

Variability of carbon dioxide flux from tropical (Cerrado) hydroelectric reservoirs

Journal

AQUATIC SCIENCES
Volume 72, Issue 3, Pages 283-293

Publisher

SPRINGER BASEL AG
DOI: 10.1007/s00027-010-0140-0

Keywords

CO2 emission; Hydroelectric reservoirs; Spatial heterogeneity; GHG; Tropical freshwaters

Funding

  1. FURNAS Centrais Eletricas S.A.
  2. National Council of Research and Development (CNPq) Brazil
  3. Division Of Environmental Biology [0917858] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Hydroelectric reservoirs generate energy without significant combustion of fossil fuels. However, these systems can, potentially, emit greenhouse gases (GHG's) at a rate which may be significant at the global scale, and, possible, co-equal, per kilowatt-hour, to that from conventional coal or oil-fired systems. Although much of the new construction of hydroelectric reservoirs is in the tropics, most of the data on GHG emissions comes from temperate regions. Further, much of the existing data on reservoir gas emissions comes from single sites, usually near the terminal dams. Large tropical reservoirs often involve the impoundments of river systems with complex morphology which in turn can cause spatial heterogeneity in gas flux. We evaluated spatial and seasonal variability in CO2 concentrations and gas flux for five large (50-1,400 km(2)) reservoirs in the Cerrado region of Brazil. Most of data set (87% of all measurements) showed CO2 supersaturation and net efflux to the atmosphere. There was as much or more variation in pCO(2) over space and among seasons. The large studied reservoirs showed different zones in terms of CO2 emission because those fluxes are dependent on flooded biomass, watershed input of organic matter and dam operation regime. Here we demonstrate that the reservoirs in the Brazilian Cerrado have low rates of CO2 emissions compared to existing global comparisons. Our results suggest that ignoring the spatial variability can lead to more than 25% error in total system gas flux.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available