4.1 Article

CSF flow study in Chiari I malformation

Journal

CHILDS NERVOUS SYSTEM
Volume 20, Issue 5, Pages 336-340

Publisher

SPRINGER-VERLAG
DOI: 10.1007/s00381-003-0881-3

Keywords

Chiari I malformation; cine MR; CSF flow

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective. The aim of this prospective study was to define the role of cardiac gated phase-contrast cine magnetic resonance imaging in deciding the therapeutic strategy in patients with Chiari I malformation. Materials and methods. Twenty-one patients operated on between February 2000 and July 2002 were enrolled in the study. All patients underwent a detailed preoperative neurological examination. MRI of the craniovertebral junction and the whole spine was done, followed by cardiac gated phase contrast cine magnetic resonance imaging. Results. Signs and symptoms of syringomyelia were noted in 15 patients and cerebellar signs in 11 patients. Three of them had trigeminal nerve involvement, and 4 had ninth and tenth cranial nerve involvement. The sixth and accessory nerves were involved in 1 patient each. Preoperative CSF flow studies revealed obstructive flow both anteriorly and posteriorly in 6 patients and only posterior block in 15 patients. One patient investigated for failed foramen magnum decompression revealed obstruction to CSF flow ventrally. Foramen magnum decompression with duroplasty was done in all these cases. The patient who had a persistent ventral flow block underwent odontoidectomy. Patients were followed up for a maximum of 36 months, with a mean of 18 months. MRI CSF flow studies revealed established flow dorsally in all cases. Seventeen patients showed clinical improvement and 2 of them did not show any neurological changes. Two patients deteriorated following an initial period with a shunt. Conclusion. MRI CSF flow study is an effective tool for deciding the type of surgery to be performed and also for monitoring patients postoperatively.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available