4.2 Article

Extracellular peptidase and carbohydrate hydrolase activities in an Arctic fjord (Smeerenburgfjord, Svalbard)

Journal

AQUATIC MICROBIAL ECOLOGY
Volume 69, Issue 2, Pages 93-99

Publisher

INTER-RESEARCH
DOI: 10.3354/ame01625

Keywords

Extracellular enzymes; Microbial loop; Proteinase; Beta-glucosidase; Chitinase

Funding

  1. Max Planck Institute for Marine Microbiology
  2. Max Planck Society
  3. Danish National Research Foundation
  4. National Science Foundation (NSF) grant [OCE-0848703]
  5. Directorate For Geosciences
  6. Division Of Ocean Sciences [0848703] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Measurements of the spectrum of extracellular enzymes present in an environment can indicate the nature of organic substrates available to microorganisms. We report the activities in an Arctic fjord (Smeerenburgfjord, Svalbard) of the extracellular carbohydrate hydrolases alpha-galactosidase, beta-glucosidase, and chitobiase, and the extracellular peptidases leucyl aminopeptidase, trypsin, and chymotrypsin. Among the carbohydrate hydrolases, beta-glucosidase had the highest potential activity. Although extracellular leucyl aminopeptidase is frequently assayed in marine systems, activities of other peptidases have only rarely been reported. Peptidase activities were higher than carbohydrate hydrolase activities by approximately 2 orders of magnitude. Activities of leucyl aminopeptidase (an exopeptidase which cleaves terminal residues from a protein) were higher than trypsin and chymotrypsin (both endopeptidases which cleave interior bonds). In contrast to previous measurements from coastal, temperate environments, potential activity of leucyl aminopeptidase in Smeerenburg was higher than that of the endopeptidases trypsin and of chymotrypsin. These results suggest that leucyl aminopeptidase may not always be a reliable proxy for the total peptidolytic potential of microbial communities.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available