4.2 Article

Bacterial activity in the sea-surface microlayer: in situ investigations in the Baltic Sea and the influence of sampling devices

Journal

AQUATIC MICROBIAL ECOLOGY
Volume 58, Issue 1, Pages 67-78

Publisher

INTER-RESEARCH
DOI: 10.3354/ame01351

Keywords

Sea-surface microlayer; Bacterioneuston; Sampling devices; Bacterial activity

Funding

  1. Leibniz Society (WGL-Pakt project FILGAS)
  2. Federal Ministry of Education and Research [FKZ: 03F0462B]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The sea-surface microlayer (SML) is considered to be an 'extreme' environment. However, it is still unclear how bacteria that inhabit the SML (bacterioneuston) react to conditions within this interface. This deficiency is partly caused by the difficulty in obtaining representative samples. Our aim was to examine different sampling devices and characterize bacterioneuston activity in the Baltic Sea. Initial in situ studies revealed a decreased incorporation of (3)H-thymidine ((3)H-TdR) by up to 90% in both glass-plate and metal-screen samples compared to the underlying bulk water. However, a series of tank experiments showed selective inhibition of bacterial productivity with either of these sampling devices, although bacterial cell counts and community composition were unaltered. The inhibition introduced by the glass plate could not be nullified by different cleaning treatments, but by the wiping technique used to scrape off the sample. Even with this modified, unbiased glass-plate technique, (3)H-TdR incorporation of the bacterioneuston was still reduced by 50 to 80% compared to that in the underlying water, whereas the abundance of 5-cyano-2,3-ditolyl tetrazolium chloride (CTC)-positive cells was not affected. Our in situ study thus revealed that in the Baltic Sea the presence of a pronounced bacterioneuston community different from that in the underlying water is unlikely. Reduced bacterial activities within the SML support the concept of a demanding habitat. Additionally, this study emphasizes the need to carefully evaluate the sampling devices used when measuring bacterial parameters. Furthermore, it supports the view that caution is required in comparisons of results from different studies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available