4.0 Article

Influence of substrate embeddedness and canopy cover on the distribution of Ephemeroptera, Plecoptera and Trichoptera (EPT) in tropical rivers

Journal

AQUATIC INSECTS
Volume 33, Issue 4, Pages 281-292

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/01650424.2011.640940

Keywords

EPT; headwater; canopy cover; embeddedness; Malaysian Peninsula

Categories

Funding

  1. Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation (MOSTI), Malaysia

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The pattern of Ephemeroptera, Plecoptera and Trichoptera (EPT) distribution in rivers of Gunung Jerai catchment in Kedah, a northern state in Peninsular Malaysia, varied significantly among rivers (p < 0.005) coinciding with the substrate embeddedness and shaded areas of their habitats. Generally Ephemeroptera preferred a habitat with optimal embeddedness (0-25% substrates surrounded by fine sediments) while Trichoptera and Plecoptera preferred marginal (50-75% substrates surrounded by fine sediments) or suboptimal (25-50% substrates surrounded by fine sediments) conditions. The Kruskal-Wallis test indicated that the EPT abundance differed significantly among various categories of substrate embeddedness (chi(2) = 19.673, p < 0.005) and canopy cover (chi(2) = 20.723, p < 0.005). The Canonical Correspondence Analysis (CCA) ordination and the non-supervised artificial neural network (ANN) showed that distribution of Neoperla (Plecoptera), Hydropsyche and Setodes (Trichoptera) were strongly influenced by the embeddedness of rivers' substrates in the surrounding sand and silts in each river. In addition, the amount of canopy covering the water surface determined the associations of Kamimuria, Ecnomus, Macrostemum, Setodes and Ganonema with their habitats. These results showed that distribution of the EPT genera in these rivers was influenced by the availability of surface area on rocky substrates and the amount of light penetration into the water.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available