4.5 Article

Effect of the A118G polymorphism on binding affinity, potency and agonist-mediated endocytosis, desensitization, and resensitization of the human mu-opioid receptor

Journal

JOURNAL OF NEUROCHEMISTRY
Volume 89, Issue 3, Pages 553-560

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2004.02340.x

Keywords

A118G polymorphism; desensitization; human mu-opioid receptor; internalization; ligand binding; potency; resensitization

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The most prevalent single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) A118G in the human mu-opioid receptor gene predicts an amino acid change from an asparagine residue to an aspartatic residue in amino acid position 40. This N40D mutation, which has been implicated in the development of opioid addiction, was previously reported to result in an increased beta-endorphin binding affinity and a decreased potency of morphine-6-glucuronide. Therefore, in the present study we have investigated whether this mutation might affect the binding affinity, potency, and/or the agonist-induced desensitization, internalization and resensitization of the human mu-opioid receptor stably expressed in human embryonic kidney 293 cells. With the exception of a reduced expression level of N40D compared to human mu-opioid receptor (hMOR) in HEK293 cells, our analyses revealed no marked functional differences between N40D and wild-type receptor. Morphine, morphine-6-glucuronide and beta-endorphin revealed similar binding affinities and potencies for both receptors. Both the N40D-variant receptor and hMOR exhibited robust receptor internalization in the presence of the opioid peptide [D-Ala(2),N-MePhe(4),Glyol(5)]enkephalin (DAMGO) and beta-endorphin but not in response to morphine or morphine-6-glucuronide. After prolonged treatment with morphine, morphine-6-glucuronide or beta-endorphin both receptors showed similiar desensitization time courses. In addition, the receptor resensitization rates were nearly identical for both receptor types.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available