4.7 Article

A high-density admixture map for disease gene discovery in African Americans

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS
Volume 74, Issue 5, Pages 1001-1013

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1086/420856

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NCI NIH HHS [N01CO12400] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NHGRI NIH HHS [K01 HG002758, K-01 HG002758-01] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NHLBI NIH HHS [HL-65234, R01 HL065234] Funding Source: Medline
  4. NIAID NIH HHS [U19-AI50864, U19 AI050864] Funding Source: Medline
  5. NINDS NIH HHS [K08 NS046341] Funding Source: Medline
  6. PHS HHS [N01-C0-12400] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Admixture mapping ( also known as mapping by admixture linkage disequilibrium, or MALD) provides a way of localizing genes that cause disease, in admixed ethnic groups such as African Americans, with similar to100 times fewer markers than are required for whole-genome haplotype scans. However, it has not been possible to perform powerful scans with admixture mapping because the method requires a dense map of validated markers known to have large frequency differences between Europeans and Africans. To create such a map, we screened through databases containing similar to450,000 single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) for which frequencies had been estimated in African and European population samples. We experimentally confirmed the frequencies of the most promising SNPs in a multiethnic panel of unrelated samples and identified 3,011 as a MALD map (1.2 cM average spacing). We estimate that this map is similar to70% informative in differentiating African versus European origins of chromosomal segments. This map provides a practical and powerful tool, which is freely available without restriction, for screening for disease genes in African American patient cohorts. The map is especially appropriate for those diseases that differ in incidence between the parental African and European populations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available