4.7 Article

Suppression of neuropathic pain by peripheral electrical stimulation in rats:: μ-opioid receptor and NMDA receptor implicated

Journal

EXPERIMENTAL NEUROLOGY
Volume 187, Issue 1, Pages 23-29

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2003.12.011

Keywords

peripheral electrical stimulation; neuropathic pain; ongoing pain; N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor; opioid receptor; analgesia

Categories

Funding

  1. NIDA NIH HHS [DA03983] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Peripheral electrical stimulation (PES) has been utilized to manage chronic pain associated with nerve injury. However, the data on clinical effectiveness are conflicting and the neurophysiological mechanism is not well known. This study was designed to assess whether PES relieved neuropathic pain and its possible mechanisms. The neuropathic pain model was made with lumbar 5th (L5) and 6th (L6) spinal nerve ligations in rats. Nociceptive responses of the rats were assessed by the cold plate test (the number and duration of paw lifts that occurred in 5 min on a 5 +/- 1 degreesC cold plate). PES with a frequency of 2 Hz and at increasing strengths was given for 30 min via stainless-steel needles inserted into standard acupoints on the leg and back, respectively. Immunochemistry was used to examine the immunoreactivity of the NMDA receptor 1 (NR1) subunit in the spinal cord dorsal horn. The results are as follows: (1) PES relieved neuropathic pain and the effect was blocked by 1.0 mg/kg naloxone. (2) The effect of one session of PES lasted up to 12 h. (3) Repetitive PES showed a cumulative effect and no tolerance was observed. (4) There was a significant increase of NR1 immunoreactivity ill the superficial laminae of the spinal cord of neuropathic pain rats as compared with naive rats. This increase could be reversed by repetitive 2 Hz PES. These results suggest that PES can relieve neuropathic pain, and that p-opioid receptors and NMDA receptors are involved in the effect of PES. (C) 2004 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available