4.5 Article

Essential role of MHC II-independent CD4+ T cells, IL-4 and STAT6 in contact hypersensitivity induced by fluorescein isothiocyanate in the mouse

Journal

INTERNATIONAL IMMUNOLOGY
Volume 16, Issue 5, Pages 685-695

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/intimm/dxh073

Keywords

allergy; eosinophils; mast cells; skin; Th1/2 cells

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Contact hypersensitivity (CHS) induced by a hapten is thought to be mediated by T helper type 1 (Th1) cells. However, FITC can induce contact allergy in vivo, and in vitro studies suggest that this response is Th2-type driven. We compared CHS reactions induced by FITC or dinitrofluorobenzene (DNFB), a well-known Th1 inducing hapten, in Balb/c mice, C57/B6 mice, and several gene knock-out mice, and investigated the role of Th1/Th2 cytokines, T cell populations, eosinophils, and mast cells. Balb/c mice (Th2 dominant strain) had a stronger response to FITC than C57/B6 mice (Th1 dominant strain). The skin inflammation was characterized by edema and eosinophilia, and serum IgE levels were elevated following FITC challenge. All responses were enhanced by a second round of sensitization. Anti-TNF-alpha or anti-very late antigen-4 (VLA-4) antibody partly inhibited both FITC- and DNFB-induced CHS. Pretreatment of mice with anti-IL-4 antibody, anti-IL-5 antibody, recombinant INF-gamma, or the mast-cell depleting agent 48/80 significantly diminished edema formation, and Stat6(-/-) mice were fully protected from FITC-induced CHS, while DNFB-induced CHS was enhanced (Stat6(-/-), mast cell depletion) or not affected (anti-IL-5 antibody). Further, mice lacking CD4(+) T cells and mice lacking both CD8 and MHC II showed very little reaction at all to FITC, while the absence of CD8 T cells alone or MHC II alone conferred partial protection only. These findings indicate a contribution of MHC II-independent CD4(+) T cells and/or CD4(+) NKT cells to the Th2 response triggered by FITC in vivo, and makes FITC-induced CHS a suitable animal model for atopic dermatitis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available