4.2 Article

Predominant type 1 CMV-specific memory T-helper response in humans: Evidence for gender differences in cytokine secretion

Journal

HUMAN IMMUNOLOGY
Volume 65, Issue 5, Pages 476-485

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.humimm.2004.02.021

Keywords

T helper cells; cytokines; gender; human cytomegalovirus; infectious diseases

Categories

Funding

  1. NCI NIH HHS [R01-CA77544, CA33572, P01-CA30206] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NCRR NIH HHS [M01-RR00043-38] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NIAID NIH HHS [R01-AI43267, R21-AI44313, AI52065] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Cell-mediated memory immune responses to viral antigens are important for protection against viruses causing persistent or acute infections. This study compared the cytokine profile of memory T-helper cells specific for cytomegalovirus (CMV) in healthy CMV-seropositive men and women. The cytokine response reflected T(H)1 bias, with dominant secretion of interferon (IFN)-gamma along with moderate levels of tumor necrosis factor-alpha, interleukin (IL)-10, and IL-2. Analyzed by gender, women had higher and significant spontaneous release of IFN-gamma and CMV-specific IL-2 secretion. Similar analysis with herpes simplex virus-1 showed a trend toward higher cytokine responsiveness in women, but the differences were not statistically significant. In contrast, men had statistically significant higher influenza virus-specific tumor necrosis factor-a secretion. IL-4 and IL-5, both T(H)2 cytokines, were low for all three viruses. The results show a predominant T(H)1 antiviral cytokine T-help memory response with significant differences linked to gender. Such differences may have an impact in the design of immunization strategies against CMV. Human Immunology 65, 476-485 (2004). (C) American Society for Histocompatibility and Immunogenetics, 2004. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available