Journal
JOURNAL OF EVALUATION IN CLINICAL PRACTICE
Volume 10, Issue 2, Pages 241-246Publisher
BLACKWELL PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2003.00460.x
Keywords
cerebrovascular accidents; guideline adherence; quality assurance; health care; questionnaires
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Rationale, aims and objectives Guidelines for stroke management should improve quality of care. Dissemination of guidelines, however, does not guarantee guideline adherence. The aim of this paper is to investigate barriers for guideline adherence to bring about suggestions for possible implementation strategies. Method Questionnaire survey among all Dutch neurologists working on neurology wards in general hospitals during the year 2000 in The Netherlands. Results The neurologists expressed a high degree of agreement with the diagnostic and preventive recommendations, but expressed doubts with regard to the therapeutic recommendations, especially for the recombinant tissue plasminogen activator therapy. In general, barriers at the organizational and the multidisciplinary team level were most prominent. Conclusions Active implementation of the guidelines seems necessary. Implementation strategies should be focused on the different sources of barriers: the caregiver, the patient and the organization of care.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available