4.7 Article

Descriptive study of intravenous immunoglobulin for the treatment of recurrent Clostridium difficile diarrhoea

Journal

JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL CHEMOTHERAPY
Volume 53, Issue 5, Pages 882-884

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/jac/dkh176

Keywords

pseudomembranous colitis; antibiotics; immunotherapy

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives: Clostridium difficile diarrhoea (CDD) cases treated with intravenous immunoglobulin during a 2 year period were reviewed to determine disease severity and response to treatment. Patients and methods: Of 580 CD cytotoxin-positive patients, five received intravenous immunoglobulin because of protracted and/or recurrent CDD (median duration 50 days, range 45-64); two had biopsy- proven pseudomembranous colitis. The five patients received a median three non-CDD antibiotic courses (range 2-8). Indices of CDD severity included hypoalbuminaemia (n = 5, median 27 g/L, range 11-29), marked hypokalaemia (n = 3, range 1.9-2.7 mM), markedly raised peripheral white cell count (n = 3, 18-34 x 10(9) cells/L), abdominal signs (n = 3) and pyrexia (n = 1). The five cases received metronidazole for median 17 days (range 0-63) plus vancomycin for median 14 days (range 10-42) before intravenous immunoglobulin. One also received rifampicin plus vancomycin and one was given Saccharomyces boulardii. Results: Intravenous immunoglobulin was given at a dosage of 300-500 mg/kg (most commonly 400 mg/kg) for one dose (two patients), two doses (two patients) and in one case for six doses. The latter patient died of intractable CDD, three had a good therapeutic response to intravenous immunoglobulin and CDD recurred within 6 weeks in one case. In the three successfully treated cases, CDD resolved within 11 days. Conclusions: Intravenous immunoglobulin is useful for the treatment of intractable and severe CDD. Controlled studies are needed to assess the true value of this and other forms of passive immunotherapy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available