4.7 Article

Nicotine improves sustained attention in mice:: Evidence for involvement of the α7 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor

Journal

NEUROPSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY
Volume 29, Issue 5, Pages 891-900

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/sj.npp.1300393

Keywords

nicotine; mice; attention; receptors; nicotinic (alpha 7); knockout

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In humans, nicotine has been shown to improve attention in both normal and impaired individuals. Observations in rats reflect some, but not all aspects of the nicotine-induced improvements in humans. To date these findings have not been replicated in mice. To examine the effect of nicotine on sustained attention in mice, we have established a version of the 5-choice serial reaction-time (5-CSR) task with graded levels of difficulty, based upon spatial displacement and a variable intertrial interval. Using this paradigm, microgram doses of nicotine produced a consistent reduction in the level of omissions and an improvement in proportion correct in normal mice. This improvement in sustained attention was made irrespectively of whether mice had previously received nicotine. In an attempt to elucidate which nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (nAChR) subtype(s) mediate this effect, we examined the performance of alpha7 nAChR knockout (KO) mice in the 5-CSR task. alpha7 nAChR KO mice not only acquired the task more slowly than their wild-type littermates, but on attaining asymptotic performance, they exhibited a higher level of omissions. In conclusion, by increasing the level of task difficulty, the performance of mice was maintained at sufficiently low levels to allow a demonstrable improvement in performance upon nicotine administration. Furthermore, as alpha7 KO mice are clearly impaired in the acquisition and asymptotic performance of this task, the alpha7 nAChR may be involved in mediating these effects of nicotine.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available