4.3 Article

Comparison of three types of adhesives in attaching coral transplants to clam shell substrates

Journal

Publisher

JOHN WILEY & SONS LTD
DOI: 10.1002/aqc.944

Keywords

coral transplantation; reef restoration; self-attachment; giant clam shells; Philippines

Funding

  1. EIII-Opearl Commission [510657]
  2. [361]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

1. Nubbins from 12 coral species were transplanted onto dead giant clam shells at three sites in a lagoon near Bolinao, north-western Philippines. Transplants were attached using three types of adhesives: cyanoacrylate glue (SG), epoxy putty (EP) and marine epoxy (ME) and were monitored over five months for detachment, in situ mortality and natural self-attachment by tissue growth. 2. Corals attached with SG showed a significantly higher rate of detachment (logrank test) than those attached with either EP or M E (P < 0.001 in each case). Also, those attached with EP showed a higher rate of detachment than corals attached with M E (logrank = 6.46. P < 0.05). 3. ANOVA (P > 0.05) and survival analysis (logrank =2.85, P > 0.05) showed no among-adhesives differences in in situ mortality. Among the species used, Porites cylindrica, Pavona frondifera, Heliopora coerulea and Porites rus had the highest survivorship with 82%, 80%, 76% and 73%, respectively. Of nubbins alive at the end of the experiment and also displayed the highest cumulative rates of self-attachment. Species with the lowest survival rates included Acropora muricata and four pocilloporids. 4. Although there was no significant difference in the number of self-attaching transplants among the adhesives, corals transplanted using ME and EP self-attached earlier than those transplanted using SG (logrank = 11.19, P < 0.01). 5. Results from this study highlight the importance of selecting the appropriate means of attaching corals to substrates and carefully considering species-specific traits of candidate corals for transplantation. Copyright (c) 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available