4.4 Article

Seasonal fluxes of O2, DIC and CH4 in sediments with Vallisneria spiralis: indications for radial oxygen loss

Journal

AQUATIC BOTANY
Volume 94, Issue 3, Pages 134-142

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.aquabot.2011.01.003

Keywords

Vallisneria spiralis; Ecosystem metabolism; Photosynthetic quotient; Radial oxygen loss; Methane; Rhizosphere

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Seasonal fluxes of dissolved oxygen, inorganic carbon and methane were measured in microcosms containing vegetated (Vallisneria spiralis L.) and unvegetated sediments under controlled laboratory conditions. We tested if measured fluxes were affected by a moderate (6% as loss on ignition, LOI) and an elevated (10%) organic matter content (OM) in sediments. Microcosms were set up with plants and sediments collected from two riverine sites, upstream (moderate OM load) and downstream (elevated OM load) of a wastewater treatment plant. Light and dark fluxes were measured and V. spiralis net primary production and respiration rates were calculated. Unvegetated sediments were always net heterotrophic and behaved as methane sources to the water column, with significantly higher CH4 release during summer from sediment with elevated OM load. Vegetated sediments were always net autotrophic with attenuated or negative CH4 fluxes, suggesting the occurrence of processes within the rhizosphere that inhibit methane production or favor its oxidation. Vegetated sediments had an unbalanced O-2 to DIC stoichiometry, with average photosynthetic quotients varying between 0.30 and 0.68, significantly below one. The missing oxygen amount varied seasonally, with a minimum in the summer coinciding with the highest water temperature, but was not dependent upon the two OM levels. Overall these results suggest that V. spiralis is likely to transport a significant proportion of photosynthetically produced oxygen to the rhizosphere. (c) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available