4.8 Article

Somatic mutation of p53 leads to estrogen receptor α-positive and -negative mouse mammary tumors with high frequency of metastasis

Journal

CANCER RESEARCH
Volume 64, Issue 10, Pages 3525-3532

Publisher

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-03-3524

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. NCI NIH HHS [CA84241, CA04964, CA93373] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Approximately 70% of human breast cancers are estrogen receptor a (ERalpha)-positive, but the origins of ERalpha-positive and -negative tumors remain unclear. Hormonal regulation of mammary gland development in mice is similar to that in humans; however, most mouse models produce only ERalpha-negative tumors. In addition, these mouse tumors metastasize at a low rate relative to human breast tumors. We report here that somatic mutations of p53 in mouse mammary epithelial cells using the Cre/loxP system leads to ERa-positive and -negative tumors. p53 inactivation under a constitutive active WAPCre(c) in prepubertal/pubertal mice, but not under MMTVCre in adult mice, leads to the development of ERalpha-positive tumors, suggesting that target cells or developmental stages can determine ERalpha status in mammary tumors. Importantly, these tumors have a high rate of metastasis. An inverse relationship between the number of targeted cells and median tumor latency was also observed. Median tumor latency reaches a plateau when targeted cell numbers exceed 20%, implying the existence of saturation kinetics for breast carcinogenesis. Genetic alterations commonly observed in human breast cancer including c-myc amplification and Her2/Neu/erbB2 activation were seen in these mouse tumors. Thus, this tumor system reproduces many important features of human breast cancer and provides tools for the study of the origins of ERalpha-positive and -negative breast tumors in mice.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available