4.6 Article Proceedings Paper

Differential gene expression patterns by oligonucleotide microarray of basal versus lipopolysaccharide-activated monocytes from cord blood versus adult peripheral blood

Journal

JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
Volume 172, Issue 10, Pages 5870-5879

Publisher

AMER ASSOC IMMUNOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.172.10.5870

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. NIAMS NIH HHS [R21AR49330] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Monocytes (Mo) are critically important in the generation of inflammatory mediators, cytokines/chemokines, and regulation of innate and adaptive immune responses. We and others have previously demonstrated significant dysregulated cytokine gene expression and protein production and in vitro functional activities of activated cord blood (CB) vs adult peripheral blood (APB) mononuclear cells (MNC). In this study, we compared, by oligonucleotide microarray, the differential gene expression profiles of basal and LPS-activated APB vs CB Mo. We demonstrated a significant increase in the gene expression of several important functional groups of CB genes compared with basal levels including cytokine (IL-12p40, 5-fold), immunoregulatory (signaling lymphocytic activation molecule, 4-fold), signal transduction (Pim-2, 3-fold), and cell structure (Rho7, 4-fold) among others. Furthermore, there was significantly differentially amplified gene expression in LPS-activated APB vs LPS-activated CB Mo, including cytokine (G-CSF, 14-fold), chemokine (macrophage-inflammatory protein la, 5-fold), immunoregulatory (MHC DRB1, 5-fold), transcription factor (junB, 4-fold), signal transduction (STAT4, 5-fold), apoptotic regulation (BAX, 5-fold), and cell structure (ladinin 1, 6-fold) among others. These results provide insight into the molecular basis for normal genetic regulation of Mo development and cellular function and differential inflammatory and innate and adaptive immune responses between activated CB and APB Mo.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available