4.1 Article Proceedings Paper

Photosynthetic responses of Haalophila stipulacea to a light gradient. I. In situ energy partitioning of non-photochemical quenching

Journal

AQUATIC BIOLOGY
Volume 7, Issue 1-2, Pages 143-152

Publisher

INTER-RESEARCH
DOI: 10.3354/ab00164

Keywords

Depth gradient; Halophila stipulacea; Irradiance; Nonphotochernical quenching; PE curves; Photosynthesis; Pigments

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The quantum yield of photosystem II (phi(II), also termed Delta F/F-m' or F-v/F-m in light- or dark-acclimated plants, respectively) of the tropical seagrass Halophila stipulacea was measured in situ using modulated fluorescence techniques over diel periods at a range of depths. Photosynthetic electron transport rates (ETRs), as derived from phi(II) values at specific ambient photosynthetically available radiation (PAR) irradiances, increased in direct proportion to increasing irradiance in the morning and, at shallow sites (7 to 10 m), reached saturating rates and then declined in the afternoon with lower PAR-specific ETRs. On the other hand, plants at 32 to 33 m showed no saturation even at midday, and the percentage reduction in PAR-specific afternoon ETRs was less than that of the shallower plants. The use of an automated shutter in the measuring device enabled non-photochemical quenching due to down-regulation and basal intrinsic non-radiative decay to be distinguished. While midday values of down-regulation were lower in deeper water, basal intrinsic non-radioactive decay remained fairly constant at 30 to 40% at all depths, with more variation in shallow waters. The maximal phi(II) (i.e. F-v/F-m) reached similar values at midnight regardless of depth. H. stipulacea acclimates to the widely varying irradiances across this depth gradient by regularly modulating down-regulation-based non-photochemical quenching processes, while dissipating a large proportion of light energy through intrinsic decay regardless of depth.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available