4.7 Article

Prospective comparison of DI vs modified D2 gastrectomy for carcinoma

Journal

BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER
Volume 90, Issue 10, Pages 1888-1892

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6601790

Keywords

gastric cancer; surgery; lymphadenectomy

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

To compare the outcomes after D1 gastrectomy with those after modified D2 gastrectomy (preserving pancreas and spleen) per-formed by specialist surgeons for gastric cancer in a large UK NHS Trust, In all, 1 18 consecutive patients with gastric adenocarcinoma were referred by postcode, to undergo either a D1 gastrectomy (North Gwent (RJ), n = 36, median age 76 years, 21 m) or a modified D2 gastrectomy (South Gwent (WL), n = 82, 70 years, 57 m). Operative mortality in the two groups of patients was similar (D1 8.3% vs D2 7.3%, chi(2) 0.286, DF I, P=0.593). Overall cumulative survival at 5 years was 32% after D1 gastrectonny compared to 59% after D2 gastrectomy (chi(2) 4.25, DF I, P=0.0392). In patients with stage III cancers, survival was 8% after D1, compared with 33% after D2 gastrectomy (chi(2) 6.43, DF I, P = 0.0112). In a multivariate analysis, T stage (hazard ratio 2.339, 95% Cl 1.683-2.995, P = 0.01), N stage (hazard ratio 4.026, 95% Cl 3.536-4.516, P = 0.0001) and the extent of lymphadenectomy (hazard ratio 0.258, 95% Cl-0.426-0.942, P = 0.0001) were independently associated with durations of survival. In conclusion, modified D2 gastrectomy can improve survival fourfold for patients with stage III gastric cancer, without significantly increasing morbidity and mortality when compared with a D1 gastrectomy. (C) 2004 Cancer Research UK.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available