3.8 Article

Comparison of neuroplastin and synaptic marker protein expression in acute and cultured organotypic hippocampal slices from rat

Journal

DEVELOPMENTAL BRAIN RESEARCH
Volume 150, Issue 1, Pages 1-7

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.devbrainres.2004.01.006

Keywords

development and regeneration; genesis of neurotics and glia; organotypic; hippocampus; synaptogenesis; neuroplastin; PSD95; development

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Organotypic hippocampal slice cultures can be used to Study hippocampal biochemistry and physiology over a chronic period on the days to weeks timescale. In order to validate the organotypic hippocampal slice culture for our ongoing studies of synaptic function, we have compared, using Western blotting, the levels of a number of synaptic proteins from in vitro organotypic hippocampal slice cultures with those from in vivo hippocampal slices prepared from age-matched controls. We chose to follow the developmental expression of the neuroplastin (np) family of immunoglobulin related cell adhesion molecules (CAMs), np65, a brain specific isoform highly expressed in hippocampal neurones and np55 a more widely expressed isoform and two synaptic marker proteins, synaptophysin, a pre-synaptic marker and postsynaptic density protein-95, PSD95, a post-synaptic marker. All showed increasing expression over the developmental time period, both in vivo and in vitro. The level of both neuroplastins was also consistent between the in vivo and in vitro preparations, whereas the level of PSD95 was markedly increased in the organotypic hippocampal slice Cultures while the level of synaptophysin was slightly decreased. Whilst these findings may indicate some differences in the composition and organisation of synapses, the developmental expression profiles of these synaptic proteins within organotypic hippocampal Slice Cultures suggests they are a valid model for the study of synapse function and development in vitro. (C) 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available