4.7 Article

Down-sizing in galaxy formation at z∼1 in the Subaru/XMM-Newton Deep Survey (SXDS)

Journal

MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 350, Issue 3, Pages 1005-1014

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.07711.x

Keywords

galaxies : clusters : general; galaxies : evolution; galaxies : formation; galaxies : stellar content

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We use the deep wide-field optical imaging data of the Subaru/XMM-Newton Deep Survey to discuss the luminosity- (mass-)dependent galaxy colours down to z' = 25.0 (5 x 10(9) h(70)(-2) M(circle dot)) for z similar to 1 galaxies in colour-selected high-density regions. We find an apparent absence of galaxies on the red colour-magnitude sequence below z' similar to 24.2, corresponding to similar toM* + 2 (similar to 10(10) M(circle dot)) with respect to passively evolving galaxies at z similar to 1. Galaxies brighter than M* - 0.5 (8 x 10(10) M(circle dot)), however, are predominantly red passively evolving systems, with few blue star-forming galaxies at these magnitudes. This apparent age gradient, where massive galaxies are dominated by old stellar populations while less massive galaxies have more extended star formation histories, supports the 'down-sizing' idea where the mass of galaxies hosting star formation decreases as the Universe ages. Combined with the lack of evolution in the shape of the stellar mass function for massive galaxies since at least z similar to 1, it appears that galaxy formation processes (both star formation and mass assembly) should have occurred in an accelerated way in massive systems in high-density regions, while these processes should have been slower in smaller systems. This result provides an interesting challenge for modem cold dark matter based galaxy formation theories which predict later formation epochs of massive systems, commonly referred to as 'bottom-up'.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available