4.6 Article

Chemical and meteorological characteristics associated with rapid increases of O3 in Houston, Texas -: art. no. D10307

Journal

JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES
Volume 109, Issue D10, Pages -

Publisher

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2003JD004141

Keywords

pollution; Houston; chemistry

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We report here on measurements made from the 62nd story of the Williams Tower on the west side of Houston, Texas between 15 August and 15 September 2000. The time series of trace gases differ from those at many other urban sites in having very rapidly increasing spikes of O-3, HCHO, and PAN. Measurements show that the highest O-3 levels in Houston are not always those measured at the surface, and the extreme values may occur aloft. Plumes with high O-3 appear to be produced largely from local sources and to have the potential to form additional O-3. The ozone production efficiency (7 molecules of O-3 produced per molecule of NOx consumed) when DeltaO(3)/Deltat greater than or equal to 20 ppb per 15 min was found to be smaller than estimates made from observations directly downwind of the Ship Channel petrochemical plants (e.g., similar to12). Back trajectories show that simple straight line flow was associated with mean O-3 levels of 56 ppb, in contrast to flow patterns associated with a decrease in wind speed or flow reversal, which were associated with mean values of 63 ppb and extremes in excess of 125ppb. VOC samples taken during periods when DeltaO(3)/Deltat greater than or equal to 20 ppb per 15 min were elevated and in particular light olefins were more than a factor of 7 greater than the corresponding samples collected on other occasions. No significant increase in isoprene at the Williams Tower was associated with these episodes. When air passed over stack emissions in eastern Houston, rich in VOCs, a Lagrangian model simulated O-3 production rates of similar to50 ppb hr(-1).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available