4.5 Article

Feeding activity strongly affects the variability of wild fish aggregations within fish farms: a sea bream farm as a case study

Journal

AQUACULTURE RESEARCH
Volume 46, Issue 3, Pages 552-564

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/are.12199

Keywords

fish farm; within-farm variability; feeding effect; substrate type; Mediterranean Sea

Categories

Funding

  1. Spanish National Research Council (CSIC) [JAEPre_2010_01276]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Factors influencing within-farm variability of wild fish aggregations have not been systematically studied. We tested the hypothesis that fish abundance and species composition vary between feeding and non-feeding periods and different bottom substrates within a Sparus aurata (L.) farm. Sampling took place during feeding and non-feeding periods on six consecutive days in July 2011. Visual censuses were carried out at three different depths and at three sampling stations over rocky-sandy and sandy substrates respectively. In all, 33 species belonging to 17 families were observed. Total fish abundance, biomass and species community significantly differed between feeding and non-feeding periods. Each depth was represented by a distinct species community and was therefore affected differently by the feeding activity. At the surface, fish abundance was significantly higher during feeding compared with non-feeding periods. The distance from the feeding vessel significantly influenced fish aggregations in the water column, indicating that planktivorous species learnt to associate the boat noise with food availability through classic conditioning. At the bottom, substrate type was the dominant factor explaining aggregation variability. This study provides new information about the dynamics of fish aggregations within farms, emphasizing the importance of considering the different sources of variability in future study designs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available