4.7 Article

Effect of three xenobiotic compounds on glutathione S-transferase in the clam Ruditapes decussatus

Journal

AQUATIC TOXICOLOGY
Volume 68, Issue 1, Pages 87-94

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.aquatox.2004.03.001

Keywords

glutathione S-transferase; biomarker; Ruditapes decussatus; 4,4 ' DDE; methoxychlor

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The effects of 4,4'DDE, methoxychlor and imidazole were studied on glutathione S-transferase activities in the gills and hepatopancreas of the clam Ruditapes decussatus. The contamination doses were 0.14 muM for 4,4'DDE, 0.14 muM for methoxychlor and 25 muM for imidazole. GST activities were spectrophotometrically measured. SDS-PAGE and isoelectric focusing (TEF) were used to separate the different GST isoforms in control and treated animals, followed by Western blotting performed with anti-alpha, anti-mu and anti-pi GST anti-sera. In the hepatopancreas, GST-CDNB activities were always two to five-fold lower than in the gills where the activities were significantly increased after exposure to 4,4'DDE (ca. 1.6-fold) and to methoxychlor (ca. 1.3-fold) compared to the controls (ca. 3 mumol min(-1) mg(-1) protein) whereas they remained unchanged after treatment with imidazole. When using glutathione S-transferase anti-alpha, anti-mu and anti-pi anti-sera, a single 26 kDa polypeptide was observed in the hepatopancreas and in the gills in all the tested conditions. Five GST subunits were observed after IEF showing greater immuno-reactivity with the anti-pi mammalian class antiserurn than with the anti-alpha or anti-mu mammalian anti-sera. One isoform of pI 5.77 was particularly induced by 4,4'DDE and methoxychlor; it was recognized by the three anti-sera tested and seemed to be more efficient in the gills than in the hepatopancreas. This isoform may play a role in organochlorine detoxication. (C) 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available