4.5 Article

The effects of varying dietary protein level on growth, feed conversion, body composition and apparent digestibility coefficient of juvenile mangrove red snapper, Lutjanus argentimaculatus (Forsskal 1775)

Journal

AQUACULTURE RESEARCH
Volume 44, Issue 5, Pages 807-818

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2109.2012.03096.x

Keywords

mangrove red snapper; Lutjanus argentimaculatus; growth; dietary protein; digestibility; body composition

Categories

Funding

  1. DelPHE Research Project [82/2007-09]
  2. DFID, UK

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The effects of several dietary protein levels on the growth, feed conversion, body composition and diet digestibility of juvenile Lutjanus argentimaculatus (body weight 12.3g) were examined. Seven isolipidic (7.4%) diets were formulated to contain graded levels of protein (2858%) with dietary energy ranging from 19.7 to 21.5kJg1. Diets were distributed to triplicate groups of fish thrice a day at ration of 2% body weight for 90days. Growth, feed conversion, protein utilization and digestibility of nutrients increased with increasing dietary protein level up to 43%, after which no significant improvement was observed. Digestibility of dry matter and energy showed a concomitant increase with the reduction in dietary wheat meal, attaining maximal values with high protein diets. No significant differences were detected in moisture, protein, lipid and ash content of whole fish or body organs as dietary protein increased. The mesenteric fat, hepato- and viscerosomatic indices decreased with increasing protein level. The cholesterol, triglycerides and haematocrit values were similar among treatments, except that high levels of plasma lipids were recorded above 43% protein diet. The use of a practical diet containing 43% protein is appropriate for the growth of L. argentimaculatus juveniles under the experimental conditions of the present study.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available