4.5 Article

Effect of replacing fishmeal with canola meal on growth and nutrient utilization in kuruma shrimp Marsupenaeus japonicus (Bate)

Journal

AQUACULTURE RESEARCH
Volume 45, Issue 5, Pages 848-858

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/are.12026

Keywords

feed utilization; growth; canola meal; amino acid retention; fishmeal replacement; kuruma shrimp

Categories

Funding

  1. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports and Science and Technology (MONBUKAGUSHO), Japan
  2. United Graduate School of Agricultural Sciences, Kagoshima University, Japan

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A feeding trial was conducted to assess the nutritional values of canola meal as a substitute for fishmeal in diets for kuruma shrimp using five isocaloric diets (190kJkg(-1)) prepared by replacing 0%, 10%, 20%, 30% and 40% of fishmeal protein with canola meal protein in CM0, CM10, CM20, CM30 and CM40 diets respectively. Triplicate groups of juveniles (0.19g) were fed the respective diets for 60days in tanks. At the end of trial, weight gain (%) and specific growth rate (% day(-1)) were not significantly (P>0.05) different among shrimp fed CM0, CM10 and CM20 diets. However, growth was significantly (P<0.05) decreased in shrimp fed CM30 and CM40 diets. As with growth performance, feed intake, feed conversion ratio and protein efficiency ratio were also decreased (P<0.05) in CM30 and CM40 groups. Whole body dry matter, methionine and proline were significantly decreased with canola meal substitution levels. In general, retention efficiency of protein and indispensible amino acids were decreased as canola meal increased in diets. It may be concluded that 20% fishmeal protein can be successfully replaced with canola meal, while supplementation of amino acids or blending with complementary proteins could facilitate higher fishmeal replacements in kuruma shrimp diets.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available