4.0 Article

Phylogeny and biogeography of the Australian trichostomes (Ciliophora: Litostomata)

Journal

PROTIST
Volume 155, Issue 2, Pages 215-235

Publisher

ELSEVIER GMBH
DOI: 10.1078/143446104774199600

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The phylogenetic relationships of members of the ciliate class Litostomatea were determined by a molecular phylogeny using the small subunit of the ribosomal RNA (ssu-rRNA) gene and a morphological phylogeny based on ultrastructural analyses of the group. Molecular analyses consistently supported the monophyly of Trichostomatia, Entodiniomorphida and the Australian trichostomes but provided limited support for a monophyletic Vestibuliferida and Haptoria. The results of the morphological analyses depended on the way in which the dataset was treated: unordered and ordered recovered a monophyletic Trichostomatia, Haptoria and the Australian trichostomes but challenged the monophyly of Entodinimorphida and Vestibuliferida; dollo recovered a monophyletic Trichostomatia and Entodiniomorphida but at the cost of a greatly longer tree than either unordered or ordered datasets. The monophyly of each Australian trichostome family was supported in all analyses and by both approaches. These results suggest that the trichostome ciliates may have become associated with mammals in Gondwana with the Australian trichostome ciliates entering Australia with primitive herbivorous marsupials. Subsequent diversification of the Australian families was probably a result of dietary specialization and oral and cortical synapomorphies define each family. We decline at this time to erect a formal taxon name for the Australian trichostomes due to the instability of other superfamilial taxa within the Litosomatea and concerns about the stability of tree topology until a better taxon sample of litostome ciliates is available.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available