4.5 Review

Methodology for genetic evaluation of disease resistance in aquaculture species: challenges and future prospects

Journal

AQUACULTURE RESEARCH
Volume 42, Issue -, Pages 103-114

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2109.2010.02669.x

Keywords

disease resistance; genetic evaluation; survival analysis; challenge testing

Categories

Funding

  1. Norwegian Research Council [192331]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Resistance against specific diseases affecting aquaculture species often show moderate to high heritabilities, and there is thus a large potential for genetic improvement. However, genetic evaluation of disease resistance based on survival under challenge testing still face some challenges that may complicate both recording and statistical analysis of disease resistance, e. g., susceptibility and time until death may be different aspects of resistance, or survival may be an inadequate measure of resistance. Hence, for some diseases, more advanced statistical modelling and/or supplementing indicators besides survival would be an advantage. Furthermore, tested individuals are usually excluded as selection candidates as they might be potential disease carriers, and thus pose a health risk. Under classical selection, this restriction reduces both accuracy and intensity of selection, as little or nothing is known about how sib selection candidates deviate from the family means. Thus, selection methods allowing within-family selection are of particular importance in selection for improved disease resistance based on disease challenge testing. Examples of such methods are indirect selection on correlated traits measurable on selection candidates, selection on identified quantitative trait loci and genomic selection. In the future, genomic information has the potential to substantially improve selective breeding for disease resistance traits, given that this information can be acquired on a massive scale and at an affordable cost.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available