4.5 Article

Partial replacement of fish meal with peanut meal in practical diets for the Pacific white shrimp, Litopenaeus vannamei

Journal

AQUACULTURE RESEARCH
Volume 43, Issue 5, Pages 745-755

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2109.2011.02883.x

Keywords

Litopenaeus vannamei; peanut meal; feed utilization; digestibility; biochemical indices; aflatoxin B1

Categories

Funding

  1. Department of Science and Technology of Xiamen, China [3502Z20093024]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, we replaced fish meal with peanut meal (PM) in isonitrogenous and isolipidic diets for Pacific white shrimp at inclusion levels of 0, 70, 140, 210, 280 and 350 g kg-1. The diets were hand-fed to three independent groups of shrimp three times a day over a 6-week period. Shrimp fed PM diets at a level of 280 g kg-1 or higher had lower per cent weight gain compared with those fed the basal diet, whereas shrimp fed PM diets at 140 g kg-1 or higher had a lower feed utilization and protein efficiency ratio compared with shrimp fed the basal diet. The feeding rate in shrimp fed PM diets at 350 g kg-1 and the survival and protease activity in shrimp fed PM diets at 210 g kg-1 or higher were lower than that in shrimp fed the basal diet. Diets containing 280 g kg-1 or higher of PM caused an increase in the whole-body moisture content of the shrimp, but decreased whole-body protein and ash contents compared with the basal diet. Nutrient digestibility was lower or tended to be lower in shrimp fed a PM diet compared with those fed the basal diet. The activities of peroxidase and acid and alkaline phosphatases in plasma decreased with increasing levels of PM inclusion up to 210 g kg-1. Superoxide dismutase activity decreased at dietary PM levels of 280 g kg-1 or higher. Aflatoxin B1 residue in the muscle was not affected by any of the treatments and remained low. The data suggest that up to 140 g kg-1 of PM could be included in practical diets for Pacific white shrimp.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available