4.6 Article

Insulin-like growth factor I receptors are more abundant than insulin receptors in human micro- and macrovascular endothelial cells

Journal

Publisher

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/ajpendo.00327.2003

Keywords

human endothelial cells; receptor; insulin; glargine

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Micro- and macroangiopathy are major causes of morbidity and mortality in patients with diabetes. Our aim was to characterize IGF-I receptor (IGF-IR) and insulin receptor (IR) in human micro- and macrovascular endothelial cells. Cultured human dermal microvascular endothelial cells (HMVEC) and human aortic endothelial cells ( HAEC) were used. Gene expression was measured by quantitative real-time RT-PCR and receptor protein by ligand-binding assay. Phosphorylation of IGF-IR beta-subunit was analyzed by immunoprecipitation and Western blot. Glucose metabolism and DNA synthesis was assessed using [H-3] glucose and [H-3] thymidine incorporation, respectively. We detected gene expression of IGF-IR and IR in HAEC and HMVEC. IGF-IR gene expression was severalfold higher than that of IR. The specific binding of I-125-IGF-I was higher than that of I-125-insulin in HAEC and HMVEC. Insulin and the new, long-acting insulin analog glargine interacted with the IGF-IR with thousand- and hundred-fold less potency than IGF-I itself. Phosphorylation of the IGF-IR beta-subunit was shown in HAEC for IGF-I (10(-8) M) and insulin (10(-6) M) and in HMVEC for IGF-I and glargine (10(-8) M, 10(-6) M). IGF-I 10(-7) M stimulated incorporation of [H-3] thymidine into DNA, and 10(-9) - 10(-7) M also the incorporation of [H-3] glucose in HMVEC, whereas glargine and insulin had no significant effects at 10(-9) - 10(-7) M. Human micro- and macrovascular endothelial cells express more IGF-IR than IR. IGF-I and high concentrations of glargine and insulin activates the IGF-IR. Glargine has a higher affinity than insulin for the IGF-IR but probably has no effect on DNA synthesis at concentrations reached in vivo.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available