3.8 Review

Toxic cyanobacteria in Greek freshwaters, 1987-2000: Occurrence, toxicity, and impacts in the Mediterranean region

Journal

ACTA HYDROCHIMICA ET HYDROBIOLOGICA
Volume 32, Issue 2, Pages 107-124

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/aheh.200300523

Keywords

Microcystin-LR; Microcystis; bioaccumulation; temporal variation; spatial variation; health risk; water quality

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In a survey in Greece from 1987 to 2000 hepatotoxic cyanobacterial blooms were observed in 9 out of 33 freshwaters. Microcystins (MCYSTs) were detected by HPLC in 7 of these lakes, and the total MCYST concentration per scum dry weight ranged from 50.3 to 1638 +/- 464 mug g(-1). Cyanobacterial genera (Microcystis, Anabaena, Anabaenopsis, Aphanizomenon, Cylindrospermopsis) with known toxin producing taxa were present in 31 freshwaters. From our data and a review of the literature, it would appear that Mediterranean countries are more likely 1) to have toxic cyanobacterial blooms consisting of Microcystis spp. and 2) to have higher intracellular MCYST concentrations. A case study in Lake Kastoria is used to highlight seasonal patterns of cyanobacterial and MCYST-LR occurrence and to assess cyanotoxin risk. Cyanobacterial biovolume was high (> 11 muL L-1) throughout the year and was in excess of Guidance Level 2 (10 muL L-1) proposed by WHO for recreational waters and Alert Level 2 for drinking water. Further, surface water samples from April to November exceeded Guidance Level 3, with the potential for acute cyanobacterial poisoning. Intracellular MCYST-LR concentrations (max 3186 mug L-1) exceeded the WHO guideline for drinking water (1 mug L-1) from September to November with a high risk of adverse health effects. Preliminary evidence indicates that in 3 lakes microcystins are accumulated in some aquatic organisms. Generally, a high risk level can be deduced from the data for the Mediterranean region.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available