4.7 Article

Time-to-treatment significantly affects the extent of ST-segment resolution and myocardial blush in patients with acute myocardial infarction treated by primary angioplasty

Journal

EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL
Volume 25, Issue 12, Pages 1009-1013

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.ehj.2004.03.021

Keywords

primary angioplasty; myocardial infarction; ischaemic time; myocardial perfusion

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aims The prognostic role of time-to-treatment in primary angioplasty is still a matter of debate. The aim of our study was to evaluate the relationship between time-to-treatment and myocardial perfusion in patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) treated by primary angioplasty. Methods and results Our study population consisted of 1072 patients with STEMI treated by primary angioplasty from 1997 to 2001. Myocardial perfusion was evaluated by using ST-segment resolution and myocardial blush grade. Time-to-treatment was defined as the time from symptom-onset to the first balloon inflation. Time-to-treatment was significantly associated with the extent of ST-segment resolution, myocardial blush grade, enzymatic infarct size, and 1-year mortality. After adjustment for baseline confounding factors, time-to-treatment was still associated with impaired ST-segment resolution (adjusted OR [95% CI] = 1.01 [1.01-1.02], p < 0.001) and myocardial blush (adjusted OR [95% CI] = 1.01 [1.01-1.02], p < 0.0001). Conclusions This study shows that in patients with STEMI treated by primary angioplasty prolonged ischaemic time is associated with impaired myocardial perfusion, larger infarct size, and higher 1-year mortality. Therefore, all efforts should be made to shorten ischaemic time as much as possible to achieve better myocardial perfusion and myocardial salvage in primary angioplasty for STEML (C) 2004 Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of The European Society of Cardiology.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available